<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poll: What is the FTC impact on blogs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://constructingsocial.com/2009/10/poll-what-is-the-ftc-impact-on-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://constructingsocial.com/2009/10/poll-what-is-the-ftc-impact-on-blogs/</link>
	<description>For Architects of the Social Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:19:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Person</title>
		<link>http://constructingsocial.com/2009/10/poll-what-is-the-ftc-impact-on-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Person</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constructingsocial.com/?p=621#comment-403</guid>
		<description>Colin:

This is certainly an important issue, and I think the ramifications will play out over time.

I&#039;d like to quibble over your question if I could. I&#039;m not sure what bloggers would &quot;fight back&quot; against? They can *still* accept sponsorships/products/services/junkets/etc as they always have; they just need to be diligent in *disclosing* them publicly.

What I hope this will mean is that the *unscrupulous* sponsorships--where disclosure is discouraged, etc.--will go away, particularly because such tactics will be against the law.

Curious to see what others think here. 

Bryan &#124; @BryanPerson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colin:</p>
<p>This is certainly an important issue, and I think the ramifications will play out over time.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to quibble over your question if I could. I&#8217;m not sure what bloggers would &#8220;fight back&#8221; against? They can *still* accept sponsorships/products/services/junkets/etc as they always have; they just need to be diligent in *disclosing* them publicly.</p>
<p>What I hope this will mean is that the *unscrupulous* sponsorships&#8211;where disclosure is discouraged, etc.&#8211;will go away, particularly because such tactics will be against the law.</p>
<p>Curious to see what others think here. </p>
<p>Bryan | @BryanPerson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
